Any experienced team of Los Angeles injury lawyers has potentially had to cope with the implications and aftermath of a backover accident at some particular point in their careers. Actually according to the National Road Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in 2010, 292 folks were fatally injured by being backed over by cars in the US and over 18,000 people were wounded. One straightforward solution would be to install rear view cameras in all new automobiles.
The NHTSA is seriously looking to bring in a law that forces makers to fit rear view cameras to all new vehicles manufactured within the US by the year 2014 and as a result they suggest this will significantly cut the quantity of folk killed through backovers every year.
One would think that this would be the best solution to a problem, however a gang of Los Angeles injury lawyers are not at all surprised that there is conflict from the car makers. In reality the vehicle makers state that the costs to do that are conjectured about 2.7 bln. This is to install devices on over sixty million cars every year. Customer action groups also worry that this can increase the price of a new automobile considerably. Furthermore vehicle makers state that the NHTSA are over controlling the industry making for most unlikely trading conditions.
As a consequence a coalition of vehicle manufacturers such as car giants, Ford, Mercedes-Benz, Chrysler, General Motors and Toyota and are lobbying against the ruling. They confirm that rear view cameras are a unnecessary expense and are something that their clients might not even need.
A Los Angeles injury lawyer states that the rationale that the NHTSA is paying particular notice to that issue is that in 2008 a governing was passed that is sometimes known as the 'Cameron Gulbransen Children Transport Safety Act'. This was named for a kid who was mistakenly reversed over and killed by his pa who at the time was driving an SUV that wasn't installed with any rear view camera caution system. This governing has given the NHTSA a time frame of 3 years yet to come up with a collection of rules or actions which can sometimes be implemented so as to reduce the amount of people being finished thru backover accidents.
The NHTSA is seriously looking to bring in a law that forces makers to fit rear view cameras to all new vehicles manufactured within the US by the year 2014 and as a result they suggest this will significantly cut the quantity of folk killed through backovers every year.
One would think that this would be the best solution to a problem, however a gang of Los Angeles injury lawyers are not at all surprised that there is conflict from the car makers. In reality the vehicle makers state that the costs to do that are conjectured about 2.7 bln. This is to install devices on over sixty million cars every year. Customer action groups also worry that this can increase the price of a new automobile considerably. Furthermore vehicle makers state that the NHTSA are over controlling the industry making for most unlikely trading conditions.
As a consequence a coalition of vehicle manufacturers such as car giants, Ford, Mercedes-Benz, Chrysler, General Motors and Toyota and are lobbying against the ruling. They confirm that rear view cameras are a unnecessary expense and are something that their clients might not even need.
A Los Angeles injury lawyer states that the rationale that the NHTSA is paying particular notice to that issue is that in 2008 a governing was passed that is sometimes known as the 'Cameron Gulbransen Children Transport Safety Act'. This was named for a kid who was mistakenly reversed over and killed by his pa who at the time was driving an SUV that wasn't installed with any rear view camera caution system. This governing has given the NHTSA a time frame of 3 years yet to come up with a collection of rules or actions which can sometimes be implemented so as to reduce the amount of people being finished thru backover accidents.
About the Author:
How an injury attorney like the Los Angeles car accident attorney can help you in the event of a back over accident? Read on the article of Catie Bellingshausen as a reference.
0 Comments with Blogger
